logo
Published on

Distributed Tracing Is Not Optional: Debugging Microservices Without It Is Finding a Needle in a Haystack

3 min read

Authors
  • avatar
    Name
    Shuwen
    Twitter

Distributed Tracing Is Not Optional: Debugging Microservices Without It Is Finding a Needle in a Haystack

Background and Project Context

Recently, I implemented a new feature that spans 10 microservices. This feature is not a simple request-response flow. It is a pipeline-style workflow where one service triggers another, propagating through multiple downstream services.

From a functional perspective, the implementation was successful. From an operational perspective, debugging quickly became the main challenge.

The Problem: Debugging Without Distributed Tracing

When issues occurred, debugging relied entirely on logs:

  • Manually opening logs for each service
  • Searching by timestamps
  • Guessing which log entries belonged to the same request
  • Repeating this process across multiple services

This approach has fundamental problems in distributed systems:

  • Logs are service-scoped, not request-scoped
  • Correlating logs across services is manual and error-prone
  • Understanding the full execution path requires mental reconstruction

As the number of microservices increases, this approach becomes unsustainable.

Without distributed tracing, debugging a multi-service workflow is effectively blind debugging. It feels like finding a needle in a haystack with no visibility into where to look.

Solution: Introducing Distributed Tracing

To address this, I implemented distributed tracing using Jaeger.

Architecture overview:

  • All microservices emit trace data
  • Trace context is propagated across service boundaries
  • Business-relevant tags are attached to spans
  • Jaeger is deployed on Amazon ECS
  • Jaeger uses its built-in storage, backed by Amazon EFS
  • No external backend (OpenSearch or Elasticsearch) is used

This setup is intentionally minimal and cost-efficient.

Results and Observability Improvements

After enabling distributed tracing, debugging changed fundamentally:

  • Entire workflows became visible end-to-end
  • Dependencies between microservices were immediately clear
  • Latency bottlenecks were easy to identify
  • Failures could be pinpointed to a specific service and operation
  • Debugging time was reduced dramatically

Instead of jumping between logs, I could:

  • Search by a single tag in Jaeger
  • See the complete pipeline across all 10 services
  • Understand exactly how a request flowed through the system

This transformed debugging from guesswork into deterministic analysis.

Cost vs. Benefit Analysis

Cost:

  • One ECS service
  • One EFS mount
  • No managed search backend
  • Minimal operational overhead

Benefit:

  • Full visibility into distributed workflows
  • Faster root cause analysis
  • Reduced operational risk
  • Significantly lower debugging time

The return on investment is extremely high. The cost is negligible compared to the productivity and reliability gains.

Key Takeaway

Distributed tracing is not a nice-to-have feature. For any distributed system with multiple microservices:

  • Logs alone are insufficient
  • Visibility into request flow is mandatory
  • Tracing provides system-level understanding that logs cannot

Without tracing, distributed systems are opaque. With tracing, they become observable.

In microservice architectures, distributed tracing is a foundational capability, not an optional enhancement.

© 2025 Shuwen